|
Tutorial: A Comparative Analysis of Next Generation Phone Systems
by Brian McConnell
While the rest of the computing industry has hyped the explosive growth
of the internet to death, an important technological shift has quietly
taken place whose implications for the telephony industry will be as important
as the emergence of the personal computer in the early 1980s. The shift
I am referring to is the shift away from expensive, proprietary servers,
to modular, low cost servers that customers can install and maintain themselves.
1998 has seen the introduction of TCP/IP and ATM-based telephone networks,
some which use PC telephony servers, some which fully merge voice and data
into the same network. The result for buyers is a vast array of
products and platforms to choose from. This article will help you select
the platform appropriate for your company.
While the idea of having customers install and maintain their own telephone
system is still heresy in some circles, several vendors have come onto
the market in the past six months with telephony servers that give traditional
PBX systems a serious run for their money by making the technology easy
to work with. Just as the Apple Macintosh™ revolutionized the personal
computer industry by setting new standards for ease of use, these systems
are similarly poised to do the same for the telephone equipment industry.
Available Platforms
In the old days, the only type of business telephone system was the PBX.
PBXs are to telephony what mainframes are to computing. They are big. They
are expensive. And they can provide a specific service to a large number
of users. Mainframes thrived for decades, but today they are being replaced
by lower cost, more versatile PCs. The same fate now awaits the PBX.
Today, you can choose from many different types of telephony platforms.
Some are traditional PBX-like systems. Some are PC-based systems. Some
are LAN-based systems. And some blur the line between all of these.
Traditional PBX/Key Systems
While the PBX's days are numbered, it is certainly not dead. PBXs have
a proven track record for providing reliable telephone service, digital
telephone handsets, and can handle a large number of users. If you have
several hundred users in a single facility and need a telephone system,
you'll certainly want to look at PBXs.
Large PBX vendors such as Lucent Technologies and Nortel are working
on technologies that will enable these systems to support voice over IP,
computer telephone integration, etc. These vendors will be able to successfully
reinvent themselves as telephony vendors for mixed voice/data networks.
Mid-sized PBX vendors with less R&D resources face a difficult challenge.
|
PC Integrated PBXs
PC integrated PBXs are ideal for mid-sized companies that need a PBX
telephone system, but want a more user friendly management interface. One
of the major problems with PBX equipment is ease of use. Most PBX vendors
have not designed their systems to be managed by end users, and require
all management tasks to be done by trained support personnel.
PC integrated
PBXs provide administrators with a simple graphical user interface that
makes it easy to add users, change system parameters, and so forth. This
eliminates the need for extensive consulting support for these systems,
and therefore lowers the cost of ownership.
|
|
PC-based telephony servers are ideal for small and mid-sized companies
that want a smart telephone system that delivers enhanced services such
as voice mail, follow me call forwarding, computer telephony integration,
and so forth. Although some MS-DOS based systems have been on the market
since the early 1990s, interest in PC-based telephony servers really took
off in 1996 with the introduction of Windows NT and Unix-based systems.
The basic system architecture involves PC-based expansion cards for
the trunk lines and stations which is controlled by a software application.
The benefits of these systems are many: improved ease of use, extensive
features, and software upgradability to name a few.
|
LAN (IP or ATM) Telephone Networks
LAN-based telephone systems are relatively new to the marketplace, although
the idea behind them is not new. Several systems have come onto the market
in 1998 which use either voice over IP (VoIP) or asynchronous transfer
mode (ATM) technology to deliver voice calls over a company's data network.
These systems eliminate the need to operate separate voice and data networks,
and in some cases, are also much easier to administer. Most of these systems also
include a "gateway" to connect to the circuit-switched PSTN.
|
Hybrid Packet/Circuit-Switched Telephone Systems
Pure LAN-based systems are interesting, but most companies do not want
to migrate to an entirely LAN-based solution. Hybrid systems blur the line
by using conventional circuit switching technology for some users, and
packet switched (i.e., Ethernet, voice over IP) technology for other users.
The ability to select different delivery technologies for different users
provides companies with great flexibility. These systems can also be used
to construct a distributed telephone network which is highly fault tolerant.
(More on fault tolerance later in this article.)
|
Virtual Telephone Systems (Intelligent Network Services)
Lastly, virtual telephone systems replace customer premise equipment
with intelligent services that reside inside the public telephone network.
These services are a great choice for small companies that want to project
a big company appearance, and for geographically distributed companies
with multiple sites, mobile workers, or telecommuters. The beauty of these
services is this: the only customer premise equipment required is a telephone,
and the "customer premise" could be any place on planet Earth that has
direct dial telephone service.
|
Choosing a Platform
The first step in choosing a telephone system is to settle on the right
type of platform for your business. Different architectures work better
for different types of applications. First, we'll discuss the relative
strengths and weaknesses of each platform. Then, we'll discuss specific
situations or applications which are especially well-suited for a particular
type of system.
| Type of System |
Definition |
Benefits |
Weaknesses |
Ideal Uses |
| Centrex Service |
Centrex is a brand name for a set of services offered
by local telephone companies on business telephone lines. Centrex allows
you to use the local telephone company, in effect, as your telephone system.
Each employee is given a private phone line. With Centrex, you can transfer
calls to other users (and outside numbers), set up 3 way calls, and forward
your telephone line to another location. |
-
No equipment to buy except telephones
-
Low monthly cost for small businesses
-
Local telephone company provides support and service
|
-
No automated attendant
-
Limited ability to manage calls
-
No computer telephone integration
-
No intelligent call management services
-
Expensive for larger workgroups
|
Small businesses (up to 10 or 20 users) with light to
moderate telephone use, and no need for enhanced services besides voice
mail. Good for companies that have fairly simple telecommunications needs. |
| PBX or Key System |
A conventional PBX or Key Telephone System is like a
telephone company central office in miniature. All of your phones are wired
to a box in your equipment room. This box provides dial tone to the telephones
and may also provide enhanced services such as voice mail, auto-attendant,
etc. |
-
Ability to handle many users on a single system (several
hundred to several thousand)
-
Support for digital feature phones
-
Designed for reliability
|
-
Enhanced services (i.e., voice mail, ACD, CTI) require third-party
add-ons which are expensive and difficult to configure
-
Limited selection of telephones, digital telephones are also
expensive
-
Upgrade path is often limited (if you outgrow a system, you
may need to buy a new system)
-
Most administrative tasks require outside contractors
|
Mid-sized and large businesses with several dozen to several
thousand users to support. These systems provide more functionality than
Centrex, but less than PC telephony servers and LAN-based systems. This
is a good choice if you need to provide fairly basic telecom services
to a large number of users. |
| PC Integrated PBX |
A PC integrated PBX is essentially the same thing as
a conventional PBX, except that the system can be connected to a computer
via a serial cable or local area network. The telephone system is programmed
via a friendly graphical user interface (GUI). This reduces the cost of
installing and maintaining the system substantially. |
-
All of the benefits of a conventional PBX, plus...
-
Windows or Java graphical user interface for system administration,
this reduces the need for outside contractors
-
Some enhanced services, such as voice mail, are built in
|
-
Additional enhanced services (i.e., ACD, CTI) require third-party hardware add-ons
-
Not as scalable as conventional PBXs (most systems max out
at 100 users)
-
No support for IP telephony (yet)
|
Mid-sized businesses (up to around 100 users) that want
a PBX they can manage in house. These systems do not provide as much functionality
as a PC telephony server, but come close. The downside is that the system
is proprietary and difficult to expand except using the vendor's own products. |
| PC-Based Telephony Server |
A PC-based telephony server is a Windows NT or Unix workstation, outfitted with expansion cards that enable it to function as
a telephone/voice mail system. |
-
Nearly all of the features of a conventional PBX, plus....
-
Graphical user interface for system administration
-
Advanced services such as automated call queueing, follow
me call forwarding, computer telephony integration, speech recognition,
and more
-
Easy system upgrades, many new features can be delivered
as software upgrades
-
Familiar software and hardware troubleshooting procedures
since the system is just a PC server
|
-
No support for digital telephones (most systems)
-
Limited support for high density digital telephone lines
such as T1 and ISDN Primary Rate
-
Dependent on the server's operating system to function
|
Small and mid-sized businesses (up to 100 users per site)
that want a user friendly, upgradable telephone system with lots of features.
They are especially useful for businesses that have mobile workers, telecommuters,
or those that want to automate the handling of inbound telephone calls. |
| LAN Telephone System |
A LAN-based telephone system uses voice over IP (VoIP)
or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) to deliver voice calls to users using
the local area network. These systems eliminate the need to operate separate
voice and data networks. |
-
Completely merged voice/data network, your telephone is an
Ethernet or ATM device
-
Simplified administration (telephony can now be managed like
any other network service)
-
Great for geographically distributed environments (TCP/IP
doesn't care where devices are physically located)
|
-
Incomplete feature set—most systems provide basic telephony
services, but are lacking in enhanced services and administration tools
-
Limited support for legacy telephone equipment such as analog
telephones
-
In spite of this, these systems are quite promising
|
LAN-based telephone systems are useful for small and
large companies that want to create an integrated voice/data network.
While these systems are fairly new, they show great promise for redefining
corporation communications by turning voice into just another data network
service. These systems are also useful for companies that have remote
sites connected to headquarters via a wide area network. |
| Hybrid Circuit/Packet-Switched System |
Hybrid systems use voice over IP (VoIP) to route calls
between switches, and use conventional analog telephony to deliver calls
from switches to individual users. These systems are typically packaged
to look like network appliances like hubs or routers, and are also very
easy to install and manage. |
-
Best of both worlds, packet-switched (TCP/IP) between switches,
circuit-switched (plain old telephone service) to end users
-
Very easy to install and manage, most systems are packaged
as turnkey network appliances. Little or no setup
-
Distributed architecture—simplifies wiring, great for campus
or distributed environments, fault tolerance (users can be spread across
many switches)
|
-
Still relatively new—most systems do not yet have a complete
feature set compared to PC telephony servers and traditional PBXs
-
No support for digital (feature) telephones
-
In spite of this, these systems are quite promising and will
displace the PBX in small and mid-sized offices
|
Hybrid systems offer the best of both the packet-switched
and circuit-switched worlds. They still work with ordinary analog telephone
handsets, so users do not have to buy special telephones. However, they
use a company's intranet to transport calls between switches. Their distributed
architecture makes them highly fault tolerant, and also simplifies wiring
in distributed environments. |
| Virtual Telephone System |
A virtual telephone system is a service which resides
inside the public telephone network. These services eliminate the need
for customer premise equipment (except for telephones), and are therefore
quite appealing to small businesses and to geographically distributed businesses. |
-
No-brainer installation, in fact there is no installation
because there is no equipment to buy or install
-
Minimal up front cost since there is no equipment to buy
-
Completely distributed (virtual) office, your users can take
their calls anywhere
-
Features are added continuously, vendors often add features
to their services. You don't have to do anything on your end to benefit
from these upgrades
-
You can cancel service at any time, no long-term commitment
|
-
Per-minute rates add up for large workgroups, and for high
traffic environments
-
Other than that, there are no major disadvantages
|
Virtual telephone systems are actually services which
reside inside the public telephone network. They provide nearly all of
the features of an expensive PBX or telephony server, without requiring
the user to buy any hardware. They are great for small businesses, companies
with mobile workers, and for companies with multiple offices. Usage charges
can add up though, so this offering is best for smaller companies with
light to moderate phone usage. |
Table 1 - Comparision of Different Telephony Platforms
Highlighted Applications and Telephony Platforms
| Application |
What Is It? |
What Type of System Is Best? |
| Automated Call Queuing/ACD |
Automated Call Queueing, or Automated Call Distribution,
allows you to automatically distribute incoming calls to a workgroup of
people (i.e., sales staff), and to queue calls (put them on hold) if everyone
in the group is busy. This is an extremely useful feature for companies
that receive many incoming calls for a group of people. For example, if
all of your sales people are busy, the system can tell callers to hold
the line for the first available customer service agent. |
PC-based telephony servers currently offer the best ACD
services, unless you are willing to spend tens of thousands of dollars on
a high end PBX/ACD. Three systems which offer especially good ACD service
are: AltiGen AltiServ, NexPath NTS, and Interactive Intelligence. |
| Busy Lamp Field |
A busy lamp field tells your users who is on the phone,
so you can see at a glance if someone else in the office is busy or
available to take a call. |
Busy Lamp Field (BLF) is available on most key telephone
systems, PBXs, and telephony servers. Network services such as Centrex
and virtual telephone systems do not typically provide a busy lamp field.
PC and LAN-based systems typically deliver BLF using software that talks
to the phone system across your local area network. |
| Computer Telephony Integration |
Computer Telephony Integration or CTI allows your computer
to coordinate with your telephone system. For example, you can use CTI
to trigger an onscreen display when your phone rings. Your computer will
use caller ID information to look the caller up in your contact manager,
and if it recognizes the number, will display the customer's information
automatically. |
Computer Telephony Integration is a basic service in
PC telephony servers, LAN-based phone systems, and in hybrid systems. It
is typically an option for PBX and key telephone systems. |
| Digital Telephone Lines (T1, ISDN, E1) |
Digital telephone lines are useful for mid-sized and large
companies that handle many calls at a time. These special telephone lines
deliver between 23 and 30 conversations on a single cable, and therefore
simplify wiring. They also deliver additional information about callers,
and also offer slightly improved sound quality over standard analog lines. |
PBXs and PC integrated PBXs currently have an advantage
here, although some PC-based and LAN-based systems also support digital
telephone lines. PC telephony servers, as a general rule, have been slow
to support this technology. |
| Internet (IP) Telephony |
Internet or IP telephony enables you to route calls either
over the conventional telephone network, or over a TCP/IP network (this
could be your own private network or the public internet). |
Anyone with 1/2 of a brain is actively working on adding
IP telephony support to their systems. High end PBXs will support IP telephony
by the end of the year. PC-based and LAN-based systems are already equipped
for IP telephony, and will also support this technology soon if not already.
LAN-based and hybrid systems already support IP telephony in some form. |
| Telecommuting/Remote Workers and Sites |
Telecommuting is becoming increasingly popular in today's
workplace, and business travel is still a fact of life. Some phone systems
make it possible for remote workers to assume a local appearance on the
phone system, so they always appear to be in the office, when in fact they
are somewhere else. |
PC-based telephony servers win this category hands down.
They provide extensive call forwarding and messaging options such as follow
me roaming (where the system will attempt to locate the user at a list
of numbers), unified messaging (where the system forwards voice mail to
a users email inbox), and numerous other features. |
Table 2 - Highlighted Applications and Telephony Platforms
Representative Vendors by Platform Type
No one vendor dominates this space. You'll find different vendors offering
solutions in each of these spaces. Following is a rundown of representative
vendors in each product category.
| Platform Category |
Comments |
Vendors/Web Sites |
| Centrex or Plexar Service |
Centrex or Plexar service is ordered through your local
telephone company or competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC). Visit our
Centrex resource page for more information about Centrex service and products
which complement it. |
HelloDirect.com Centrex Resources |
| Key Telephone Systems |
Key telephone systems are best used in small offices
(32 or fewer users) which do not require complex services such as computer
telephone integration. |
|
| PBX Telephone Systems |
PBX telephone systems are offered by a wide range of
companies from industry giants like Lucent Technologies to smaller companies
like Comdial. |
|
| PC Integrated PBXs |
PC integrated PBXs represent a relatively new category
of system. Following is a list of representative vendors in the mid-sized
market (up to 100 users). |
|
| PC Telephony Servers |
PC-based telephony servers, available since the early
1990s, are a good choice for small and mid-sized businesses looking for
an affordable, feature rich system with lots of call forwarding and messaging
options. |
|
| LAN-Based Telephone Networks |
LAN-based telephone networks, introduced in early 1998,
are the best example to date of the convergence of voice and data networks.
These "one wire to the desktop" solutions will be appealing to companies
with a heavy data focus. |
|
| Hybrid LAN/Circuit-Switched Systems |
Hybrid systems deliver the best of the traditional telephony
and data networking worlds. They use conventional telephony technology
to connect phones to the system, and they use IP telephony to transport
calls between switches. Some systems also provide integrated internet access
via ISDN or T1 data lines. These are great solutions for companies that
want an integrated, turnkey telecom solution. |
|
| Virtual Telephone Systems |
Virtual telephone systems eliminate the need to buy on
site equipment (except for one or more telephones). These services enable
even very small businesses to project a professional image, and to benefit
from enhanced services like voice mail, fax mail, follow me call roaming,
and more. |
|
Choosing a Vendor
Once you have decided which platform will work best for your business,
the next step is to select the best vendor in a given category. The best
way to do this is to decide which features are most important to you. Most
of these systems do not excel at everything. For example, some systems
may offer excellent telephony services, but marginal email integration
features.
We have designed a sophisticated product search engine which enables
you to quickly locate products which will work for a given application.
You complete a short survey, and your preferences are matched against our
database of products to produce a list of products which match your criteria.
You can then compare the products side by side.
Our product search engines are located at HelloDirect.com Product Selection Service
If you would like to post a question for one of our support engineers,
be sure to visit the HelloDirect.com
Forum. This interactive bulletin board and chat system is full of information,
and is also monitored by our engineers. We respond to customer questions
quickly (usually within an hour or so). We can also be reached via email
at sales@phonezone.com. If possible,
please post your questions in the forum so other visitors can see your
question, as well as answers.
What About Price?
Plan to spend anywhere from $200 to $1000 per user depending on
the type of system you are interested in. While these numbers may sound
high, it is important to take a number of factors into consideration when
pricing and comparing telecom solutions.
Factor #1 – What Is the Gross Cost per User per Month
Most companies use their telecom system for at least two years before
upgrading or replacing the system. To estimate the per-user/per-month cost
of your system, take the total cost of the system, divide this by the number
of users, and then divide that number by 20. So, for example, a system
that averages $500 per user really costs $25 per user per month.
Factor #2 – Local Toll Savings
A PBX or Key System will reduce the number of outside telephone lines
you need compared to a Centrex system. So, for example, if you currently
have 10 employees, each with a private line, and switch to a system which
allows your 10 employees to share 4 outside lines, you no longer need 6
phone lines. Business telephone lines cost approximately $20 to $30 per
month, not including usage, so in this example, you would save approximately
$120 to $180 per month, or about $1500 to $2,000 per year.
Factor #3 – Long Distance Toll Savings
Systems that support voice over IP (internet telephony) can also reduce
long distance charges, particularly for calls placed between offices outfitted
with similar equipment. For example, let's suppose you have two offices
that are connected to a wide area network or virtual private network.
You place an average of 40 hours worth of interoffice phone calls per month.
Each office is outfitted with a Touchwave WebSwitch ($6,500 ea). Using a
per-minute rate of 10 cents to estimate toll charges, you save approximately
$240 per month, or nearly $3,000 per year, on interoffice toll charges by
routing interoffice calls over your WAN. Over two years, this savings alone
reduces the real cost of your systems from $13,000 to roughly half that
amount.
Factor #4 – Increased Productivity
Many of these systems provide services such as automated call queueing,
remote call forwarding, and message management which enable your employees
to work more effectively. These benefits are difficult to quantify and
cannot be easily formulated. However, if the addition of an ACD for your
sales people enables them to handle 20% more calls with the same staff,
it stands to reason that this will have a direct impact on your business
performance.
Factor #5 – Reduced Staff Requirements
When used wisely, auto-attendant and automated call queueing services
will eliminate the need for a full-time receptionist, allowing you to give
this person other duties besides answering the phone all day. Most systems
do not entirely eliminate the need for a receptionist, but do dramatically
reduce the volume of calls handled by an operator. This means your office
staff can spend more time on other matters besides saying "How may I direct
your call?" For most businesses, this equates to $20,000 per year worth
of "found money." An employee who was once tied up answering the phones
all day can now be given other duties, which means you can do more work
with the same staff.
Here is a simple formula for estimating the real cost (or benefit) of
a system.
| Step |
Description |
Comments |
Example |
| 1. |
Start with total system price |
|
$20,000 for two 8 line x 16 extension PC telephony servers,
each to be installed at different offices |
| 2. |
Estimate monthly local telephone savings |
Estimate how many fewer phone lines you will need per
month, multiply this number by $30. |
$480 per month, 32 users now share 16 lines, for a net
savings of 16 outside phone lines used at both offices |
| 3. |
Multiply monthly telephone savings by 20 months |
We assume that you use the system for 20 months. This
is a conservative estimate. You will probably use it longer. |
(-) $9,600 in local phone charges |
| 4. |
Estimate monthly long distance savings |
If you are using IP telephony to transport calls between
offices, estimate the number of hours of interoffice calls per month. Multiply
this number by $6 per hour. |
20 hours per month of interoffice calls @ $6/hour equals
$120 per month in toll savings |
| 5. |
Multiply monthly long distance savings by 20 months |
|
(-) $2,400 in long distance savings |
| 6. |
Productivity improvements |
This is difficult to estimate. A call queueing system,
for example, allows the same number of sales people to handle more calls,
and therefore to close more sales. We will not factor this into this example. |
n/a |
| 7. |
Staff reductions |
The use of an automated attendant and call queueing system
reduces your receptionists telephone related workload by 50%, thus freeing
this employee to perform other tasks. |
Assume $2,000 per month salary x 50% = $1,000 per month effective
savings |
| 8. |
Multiply monthly staff savings by 20 months |
|
(-) $20,000 in effective savings |
| 9. |
Combine costs and savings to estimate real cost (or benefit)
of the system |
|
$12,000 net benefit as a result of using the system.
The system actually pays for itself when all of these factors are combined. |
| 10. |
Divide this number by 20 months |
This will give you an estimate of the monthly cost or
profit associated with the system. |
$600 per month in effective savings/profit |
Even if you just take the total price of a system, and divide this by
the number of users, and then divide that number by 20 months, you will
typically be paying less than $50 per user per month. You spend 2 to 4
times as much on health insurance per employee, so in the context of other
operating expenses, this is not a big number.
When you consider the benefits of using a more sophisticated system
(i.e., toll savings, improved productivity, workload reduction), the system
will more than likely break even or even generate some profit.
So, a decent telecommunications solution will not only make your company
sound better, it will also have a direct impact on your bottom line.
|